Available in PDF format (262 Kb)
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency(CEA Agency) has commenced an environmental assessment (EA) pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012) for Prodigy Gold Incorporated’s (the Proponent) Magino Gold Mine (the Project).
Prodigy Gold Incorporated, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Argonaut Gold Incorporated, is proposing the re-development of the Magino Gold mine. The proposed project, located 14 kilometres south-east of the town of Dubreuilville, Ontario, would involve the construction, operation, decommissioning, and abandonment of an open-pit mine and metal mill. Mining will occur over seven to eight years with an ore production capacity of 30,000 tonnes per day. The on-site metal mill would have an ore input capacity of 15,000 tonnes per day and will operate for approximately 15 years.
The CEA Agency and the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change have agreed to coordinate the federal and provincial EAs to the extent possible pursuant to the Canada-Ontario Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation.
Nothing in this Project Agreement (the Agreement) fetters the powers, statutory authorities and functions of federal departments/agencies and their respective Ministers.
The signatories to this Agreement (the Parties) commit to work together to facilitate an effective, accountable, transparent, timely and predictable federal review in relation to the proposed project and to contribute to fulfilling the Crown’s duty to consult Aboriginal groups.
The purpose of this document is to provide detailed information pertaining to the federal review process where the CEA Agency is the responsible authority during the EA. For further information regarding the federal review process, please refer to The Federal Review Process for Major Projects: Project Agreement Companion Document (the Companion Document).
2.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following federal departments and agencies have identified an interest in the Project, and will participate in the federal review:
- Responsible authority: The CEA Agency will ensure that an EA is conducted, an EA Report is prepared and that an EA Decision Statement is issued;
- Federal authorities (FAs): Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), Environment Canada (EC), Health Canada (HC) and Transport Canada (TC) may be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project;
- Regulatory departments: DFO, EC, TC, and NRCan may have regulatory and statutory duties in relation to the Project;
- Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada has advisory responsibilities in relation to the Project to support consistency with the Government of Canada’s Whole of Government approach to Aboriginal consultation activities; and,
- The Major Projects Management Office will provide oversight and advice throughout the entire federal review in relation to the Project to ensure adherence to the service standards and roles and responsibilities of all Parties as described in the Agreement and the Companion Document.
3.0 ABORIGINAL Consultation
The Parties are committed to a Whole of Government approach to Aboriginal consultation that is integrated with the EA and regulatory process, to the extent possible. For more information on the Whole of Government approach, including roles and responsibilities of departments and agencies, as well as coordination during the project review, please refer to Annex I of the Companion Document.
Where applicable, the terms and conditions of all existing agreements or protocols and/or MOUs between the Crown and Aboriginal groups will be respected.
Timelines identified in the Agreement represent the time expected to be taken by federal departments and agencies in carrying out their respective tasks. The timelines do not account for time taken by the Proponent to collect information or undertake a study at the request of the CEA Agency during the EA or regulatory departments during the regulatory phase. The target timelines for the federal review are as follows:
- Completion of the EA, as per CEAA 2012 – 365 days from the posting of the Notice of Commencement (NoC) on the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry Internet Site (CEARIS) to the Minister of the Environment's (the Minister) EA Decision Statement about whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects.
- Regulatory decisions pursuant to the Fisheries Act and the Navigation Protection Act (NPA) – 90 days from receipt of a complete application assuming the Minister’s EA Decision Statement has been posted on the CEARIS and no additional consultation is required.
- Regulatory decision pursuant to the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations – 8 months from the Minister’s EA Decision Statement posted on the CEARIS. The timeline will be reduced to 6 months if Treasury Board is satisfied that the Conditions for Exemption have been met (see the Companion Document for additional information).
- If appropriate, regulatory decision pursuant to the Explosives Act – 1 month from the submission of a complete and acceptable application for an Explosives Factory Licence assuming the Minister’s EA Decision Statement has been posted on the CEARIS.
- If appropriate, issue an Order in Council (OIC) exemption under s.24 of the NPA – 11.5 months from the Minister’s EA Decision Statement posted on the CEARIS.
The Parties hereto have signed the Agreement, in counterpart, on dates indicated below.
Original signed by:
Natural Resources Canada
|September 22, 2014|
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
|September 25, 2014|
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
|September 24, 2014|
Associate Deputy Minister
(on behalf of Louis Lévesque Deputy Minister,
|September 24, 2014|
|September 24, 2014|
Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada
|September 25, 2014|
|#||Milestone||Lead||Support As Needed||Timeline/Completion Date|
|1||Post the Notice of Commencement (NoC) on the CEARIS||CEA Agency||FAs||September 3, 2013|
|2||Public and Aboriginal group comment period on the draft EIS Guidelines||CEA Agency||FAs||September 3, 2013 - October 3, 2013|
|3||Finalize the EIS Guidelines and provide to the Proponent||CEA Agency||FAs||November 1, 2013|
|4||Submit the EIS and EIS Summary||Proponent||CEA Agency, FAs||To be determined by the Proponent|
|5||Review of the EIS to ensure the requirements of the EIS Guidelines are met||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 60-71 (12 Days)|
|6||Public and Aboriginal group comment period on the EIS summary||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 72-101 (30 Days)|
|7||Federal review and provision of comments on the EIS to the Proponent||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 72-131 (60 Days)|
|8||Submit revised EIS or additional information, as appropriate||Proponent||CEA Agency, FAs||To be determined by the Proponent|
|9||Review the revised EIS or additional information, as appropriate||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 132-161 (30 Days)|
|10||Prepare the draft Environmental Assessment Report (EAR)||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 162-219 (58 Days)|
|11||Federal review and provision of comments on the draft EAR to the CEA Agency||FAs||Day 220-249 (30 Days)|
|12||Public and Aboriginal group comment period on the draft EAR||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 220-249 (30 Days)|
|13||Finalize the EAR and submit to the Minister||CEA Agency||FAs||Day 250-305 (56 Days)|
|14||Issue the EA Decision Statement||Minister||CEA Agency||Day 306-365 (60 Days)|
|15||Post the Minister’s EA Decision Statement on the CEARIS||CEA Agency||Day 366-372 (7 Days)|